Tuesday, June 28, 2005

From Our Core

Why are many Quakers activists to some degree or another?

This question has been asked from time to time and I think there are almost as many answers to this as there are Quakers. However, there are some basics that I think I can cover to at least get things going.

Quakers believed (and believe) that the light of God, or seed of God, was (is) in every human being. This belief led to the Peace Testimony and the traditional stance of Quakers to not take life or participate in war. Quakers also believe that the presence of God, the inner Christ, is available to everyone. We just have to listen. Notice I used the word everyone. This led Quakers towards an egalitarian path. A path that produced a unique form of corporate worship and vote-less decision-making process based on the idea that guidance is available to everyone and everyone should have the opportunity to be heard.

When you have these ideas at the core of your belief system starting in the 1640’s in a world that engaged in widespread slavery, believed women were almost property, and had kings that claimed rule by divine right; well, you get activists. In fact, for early Quakers, simply believing what they believed and living it in their day-to-day lives was a highly charged political act.

On top of this, many Quakers did and still do believe that Jesus talked of creating the Kingdom of God, here, now. Jesus wanted to alleviate the suffering of the poor and those who had suffered injustice. Combining the belief that the seed of God was in everyone, the inner Christ was available to everyone, and that to walk in the footsteps of Jesus was to seek to alleviate suffering and end injustice; you get activists.

However, because Quakers believed and believe in direct access to the inner Christ and experience “leadings” and have “concerns” their activism takes them beyond relationships defined by law and towards relationships defined by empathy, compassion and shared aspirations. Throughout history there have been people who have attempted to use religious writings, or strategically lifted passages from those writings, to justify a host of human inequities. These have included slavery, the servitude of women, capital punishment, divine right of kings, segregation, class-based societies, etc. Quakers have generally sought, based on their experience of the light, and the teachings of Christ from the New Testament that supported their experience of the light, to end injustice wherever possible. Further, many have felt led by the personal relationship with God, the inner Christ, to dedicate their lives to the liberation of humanity from social injustice, war and poverty. Many have been dedicated to the point of giving their lives for these causes. Living in the light so that others may experience it. All of this together helps explain why Quaker activism has often been considered “liberal” or left of center.

In this way, Quakerism is compatible with many of the goals of secular humanism and there is a natural sense of alliance and affection between many secular humanists and Quakers. In fact, many secular humanists have become Quakers. However, Quakers, unlike some secularists who are sustained by enlightened rationalism, naturally deep felt empathy and/or compassion (all wonderful), are generally motivated by a core religious conviction of equality borne out of experience of the inner Christ, the source, or God. This sense of communion with that which is, the prime mover, and the sense of mission it creates has sustained many Quakers through severe trials that have included harassment, imprisonment, property confiscations, and even death. Therefore, Quaker activism over many centuries has been sustained by the core beliefs and experiences of the divine. It is this deep resource or grounding that has given strength to the community and continues to give strength to the community.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I agree with this, perhaps even a little more so than Quaker Ranter does.

My own feeling is that your statement...

"Throughout history there have been people who have attempted to use religious writings, or strategically lifted passages from those writings, to justify a host of human inequities."

...actually represents the launching point for all your other points.

I suspect that at its core, Quakerism historically evolved as a reaction to this "cynical opportunism" (to use my term for it). And, to my mind, in our televangelized, church-as-state nation, it clearly represents that today.

Taken individually, I doubt whether there was anything unique about various Quaker values or testimonies. Any one of them could be found historically manifest in the lives of individual believers, or even in faith communities. (This is probably more profound that it seems at face value). Quakerism, then, was an historical movement in which the sum was vastly greater than its parts.

I can't close without adding that this rebellion against imposed control intrinsically has a dark side -- namely, anarchism. Even a simple, benign testimony such as consensus carries such dangers.

I am inclined to the proposition that Quakerism is one of the great human (humane) institutions. I am also inclined to the proposition that all human institutions are tainted with corruption.

--Mitchell Santine Gould

Pax said...

Dear Mitchell:
Thank you for adding your thoughts. You closing words leave me with some things to work over in my mind.

Anonymous said...

Hmmm...

Sorry to have to re-post, but although I stand by my statement, I realize it probably sounds far more ominous than I intended.

When I referred to institutions tainted by corruption, I not only meant to include a government agency afflicted by classic corruption.

In a much less spectacular fashion, a band of believers can hampered to reach a wise decision because of individual vanity or any other personal foible. This is a form of human corruption too, in my view.

We trust divine guidance to get us through these problems, but the point I was trying to make is that nothing about human life is perfect.

-- Mitch

Pax said...

Thank you for the clarification Mitchell. I now understand what you are saying and agree. Too often our personal agendas do intervene just like institutional momentum often overrules the common good. Like you, I do hope that we can lay ourselves aside, guidance can be heard, and the good can be raised up.
All the best...

Joe G. said...

I'm just catching up with my blog-reading and read this post.

I appreciate both the post and the comments by Mitchell.

I heartily agree with all of the above: Quakers have much in common with humanism. And yet, what many perhaps don't realize, is that this empathy for others is borne out of our experience of God in our hearts and in our midst as a community. This took me many years just to begin to understand this.

And it is because, as Mitchell points out, that nothing is perfect when it comes to human enterprise, that we seek Divine Guidance to assist us with this messy stuff we tend to get ourselves into on a fairly regular basis!